UK case law
Ahmed Hassan v Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors
[2026] UKFTT GRC 99 · First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Transport · 2026
The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Full judgment
21. There is no evidence in support of the alleged “ unforeseen circumstances ” causing a “ massive burden preventing completion of the final part of the training programme ” however in any event such personal and/or individual interruptions are part of everyday life that can affect anyone by restricting progress in their chosen occupation and do not necessarily mean that the objective application of the statutory test can be determine to be “wrong or unjust” as the Appellant submits.
22. The trainee licence is a limited pathway to gain experience, not an alternative to registration; (the typical duration is six months).
23. The Appellant failed to comply with conditions of the first licence by not completing 20 hours of additional training (ADI 21AT).
24. Two cancellations and two failures indicate insufficient progress despite ample opportunity.
25. The Appellant can pursue further training without a trainee licence (e.g., unpaid practice, courses), and refusal does not bar sitting Part 3. Directions:
26. No further directions. The Appellant may continue preparations and attempt Part 3 without a trainee licence, provided no paid instruction is given (per s.123(1) RTA 1988 ). Costs:
27. No order as to costs (unless an application is made under the Tribunal Rules). Parties may file any costs submissions within 7 days. Right of Appeal:
28. Any party dissatisfied with this decision may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days of the date of this decision, identifying the alleged error of law. Judge: Tribunal Judge Brian Kennedy. Date: 19 January 2026.