UK case law

Wills & Ors v Crown Estate Commissioners & Ors

[2003] EWHC CH 1952 · High Court (Chancery Division) · 2003

Get your free legal insight →Email to a colleague
Get your free legal insight on this case →

The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Full judgment

Mr Justice Peter Smith: JUDGMENT ON COSTS

1. This judgment on costs arises out of paragraph 39 of my judgment of 14 th July when I indicated that the appellant had won on the interest point but lost on the discretion point.

2. I indicated in that paragraph that I thought the appeal was disproportionate and that too much time and costs had been expended by both sides arguing over very modest sums.

3. I indicated that I would make a costs determination on written representations to save costs but I did not encourage it and intimated that my provisional view was that both sides had won something and lost something so that I would make no order for costs on the appeal.

4. Despite my discouraging remarks both sides have submitted further detailed written submissions setting out why they should each have the costs of the appeal

5. I have carefully considered the submissions but am firmly of the view for the reasons set out above and in the earlier judgment that the proper order to make should be no order as to costs and that is the order I make in respect of the appeal costs